Implementation of Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process in Ranking Student Learning Achievement

Authors

  • Lilis Widayanti Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Asia Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32815/jitika.v19i1.1112

Keywords:

assessment, fuzzy ahp, fuzzy logic, learning outcomes, smk 3 pgri

Abstract

One of the important components in determining the right learning strategy is the assessment of student learning achievement. At SMK PGRI 3 Sidoarjo, assessments are not only carried out on academic aspects, but also pay attention to social, spiritual, skills, knowledge, and attendance aspects. However, the assessments carried out still use a system using direct weighting. The ranking system using direct weights has a weakness of subjectivity in the weights based on the assessor's intuition so that the results are less objective. Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) can increase objectivity in conducting rankings because the weights become more proportional. This study aims to implement Fuzzy AHP for assessing student learning achievement at SMK PGRI 3 Sidoarjo. This study contributes to the literature on the application of the Fuzzy AHP approach in student ranking and may serve as a foundation for the advancement of increasingly complex decision support systems in academia. The variables involved in Fuzzy AHP for student ranking are social attitude, spiritual attitude, skills, knowledge, and attendance. The final results of the study indicated that the fuzzy AHP based student ranking system produced a match of 45%, with a mismatch rate of 55% compared to the direct weighting system. This indicates that the Fuzzy AHP method is indeed different from the direct weighting system in terms of objectivity. The difference in results is due to the approach in determining the weight of different criteria.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, F., & Kilic, K. (2024). Does fuzzification of pairwise comparisons in analytic hierarchy process add any value? Soft Computing, 28(5), 4267–4284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09593-9

Canco, I., Kruja, D., & Iancu, T. (2021). AHP, a Reliable Method for Quality Decision Making: A Case Study in Business. Sustainability, 13(24), 13932. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413932

Chen, X., Fang, Y., Chai, J., & Xu, Z. (2022). Does Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Work Better Than Analytic Hierarchy Process? International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 24(2), 909–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01163-1

Harahap, A. R., Simbolon, N. H. M., Agata, R. A., & Sunarsih, S. (2022). Metode Fuzzy AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) untuk Pemilihan Metode Pembelajaran Demi Menunjang Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Sains Dan Edukasi Sains, 5(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.24246/juses.v5i1p9-17

Leenknecht, M., Wijnia, L., Köhlen, M., Fryer, L., Rikers, R., & Loyens, S. (2021). Formative assessment as practice: the role of students’ motivation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1765228

Muhammad, A., Siddique, A., Naveed, Q. N., Khaliq, U., Aseere, A. M., Hasan, M. A., Qureshi, M. R. N., & Shahzad, B. (2021). Evaluating Usability of Academic Websites through a Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical Process. Sustainability, 13(4), 2040. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042040

Naharudin, N., Azmi, N. A. A., & Khalid, N. (2025a). Application of Fuzzy-AHP in GIS in Finding E-Scooter Trail for Street Art. Revue Internationale de Géomatique, 34(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.32604/rig.2025.058078

Naharudin, N., Azmi, N. A. A., & Khalid, N. (2025b). Application of Fuzzy-AHP in GIS in Finding E-Scooter Trail for Street Art. Revue Internationale de Géomatique, 34(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.32604/rig.2025.058078

Safiesza, Q. F. F., Sari, L. M., Yogi, M., Sunarya, A. A., Farras, M. N., & Evizal, M. F. (2024). Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) Methods in Criteria and Alternative Perspectives for Ranking. IJATIS: Indonesian Journal of Applied Technology and Innovation Science, 1(2), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.57152/ijatis.v1i2.1137

Sutrisno, S., Mayasari, N., Rohim, M., & Boari, Y. (2023). Evaluasi Keputusan Kelayakan Bonus Karyawan Menggunakan Metode AHP-WP. Jurnal Krisnadana, 3(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.58982/krisnadana.v3i1.491

Xu, S., Yeyao, T., & Shabaz, M. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making for determining best teaching method using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Soft Computing, 27(6), 2795–2807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07554-2

Yanto, M. (2021). Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP Dalam Seleksi Produk. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi Bisnis, 3(1), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.47233/jteksis.v3i1.161

Yu, Y. (2022). Evaluating Teaching Quality in Colleges and Universities of Public Art Education Using the AHP Fuzzy Comprehensive Method. Scientific Programming, 2022, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3529311

Published

18-03-2025

How to Cite

Widayanti, L. (2025). Implementation of Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process in Ranking Student Learning Achievement. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Asia, 19(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.32815/jitika.v19i1.1112