Utilizing Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networks for Predicting Seismic-Induced Building Damage: A Bawean Region Case Study

Main Article Content

Ahmad Zarkoni
Agung Teguh Wibowo Almais
Cahyo Crysdian
Mokhamad Amin Hariyadi
Usman Pagalay
Tomy Ivan Sugiharto

Abstract

This study examines the feasibility of employing Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to estimate earthquake-induced building damage using a focused dataset derived from the continuous 8-day mainshock–aftershock sequence that occurred in March 2024. A total of 483 events were analyzed, utilizing three readily available source parameters: magnitude, depth, and epicentral distance to predict the corresponding EMS-98 damage grade. The motivation for using an LSTM architecture stems from its capacity to model temporal dependencies within sequential seismic activity, despite the limited size of the dataset. The best-performing single-split model (B4) achieved a test R^2 of 0.5738 and an RMSE of 0.2997 on the held-out set. However, to obtain a more robust assessment of the model’s generalizability, a 5-fold TimeSeriesSplit cross-validation was conducted. The cross-validation procedure yielded a mean R^2 of 0.49 with a standard deviation of 0.27, and a mean RMSE of 0.33 with a standard deviation of 0.16. These results demonstrate that the LSTM model provides a credible baseline model for exploratory damage estimation, although a substantial portion of the variance remains unexplained due to the absence of geotechnical, soil amplification, and structural fragility information. The findings highlight the potential of sequence-based modeling for rapid damage estimation and underscore the need for integrating site-specific and structural variables in future work to enhance predictive accuracy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zarkoni, A., Almais, A. T. W., Crysdian, C., Hariyadi, M. A., Pagalay, U., & Sugiharto , T. I. (2025). Utilizing Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networks for Predicting Seismic-Induced Building Damage: A Bawean Region Case Study. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Asia, 20(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.32815/jitika.v20i1.1212
Section
Article

References

Almais, A. T. W., Susilo, A., Mujtaidah, A., & Wicaksono, H. (2025). Post-Disaster Building Damage Assessment Using PCA-Clustering Based on Watershed Segmentation with Augmentation. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.173933047.71267877/v1

Almais, A. T. W., Susilo, A., Naba, A., Sarosa, M., Crysdian, C., Tazi, I., Hariyadi, M. A., Muslim, M. A., Basid, P. M. N. S. A., Arif, Y. M., Purwanto, M. S., Parwatiningtyas, D., Supriyono, & Wicaksono, H. (2023). Principal Component Analysis-Based Data Clustering for Labeling of Level Damage Sector in Post-Natural Disasters. IEEE Access, 11, 74590–74601. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3275852

Almais, A. T. W., Susilo, A., Naba, A., Sarosa, M., Juwono, A. M., Crysdian, C., Muslim, M. A., & Wicaksono, H. (2024). Characterization of Structural Building Damage in Post-Disaster using GLCM-PCA Analysis Integration. IEEE Access, 12, 146190–146201. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3469637

Azis, M. F. A., Darari, F., & Septyandy, M. R. (2020). Time Series Analysis on Earthquakes Using EDA and Machine Learning. 2020 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS51025.2020.9263188

Bai, T., & Tahmasebi, P. (2022). Attention-based LSTM-FCN for earthquake detection and location. Geophysical Journal International, 228(3), 1568–1576. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab401

Ekaptiningrum, K. (2024). Tren Gempa Bumi di Indonesia Terus Meningkat, Mitigasi Gempa Bumi Perlu Diperkuat. Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/tren-gempa-bumi-di-indonesia-terus-meningkat-mitigasi-gempa-bumi-perlu-diperkuat/

Geophysics, A. M. C. and. (2024). Earthquake Bulletin 2024 Malang Geophysical Station.

Hao, W., Yin, H., Liu, J., Ma, R., Zhao, D., & Lu, S. (2025). Seismic response prediction of soil tunnel structure based on CNN-LSTM model. Structures, 73, 108381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108381

Hartono, E. D., Lastriyanto, A., Zubaidah, E., & Hendrawan, Y. (2025). Prediction Analysis of Heat Penetration in Ohmic Heating using Multivariate Long Short-Term Memory Networks. Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, 15(3), 22527–22537. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.10063

Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

Jalayer, F., & Ebrahimian, H. (2019). Long-term seismic risk assessment considering the triggered aftershocks. In P. M. & F. M. (Eds.), COMPDYN Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 2708–2724). National Technical University of Athens. https://doi.org/10.7712/120119.7104.19740

Juanara, E., & Lam, C. Y. (2025). Machine Learning Approaches for Early Warning of Tsunami Induced by Volcano Flank Collapse and Implication for Future Risk Management: Case of Anak Krakatau. Ocean Modelling, 194, 102497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2025.102497

Li, J., He, J., Liu, Y., Wang, D., Rafay, L., Chen, C., Hong, T., Fan, H., & Lin, Y. (2019). Spatial autocorrelation analysis of multi-scale damaged vegetation in the Wenchuan earthquake-affected area, Southwest China. Forests, 10(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10020195

Li, T., Du, Y., & Yuan, Y. (2019). Use of variable fuzzy clustering to quantify the vulnerability of a power grid to earthquake damage. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205633

Manur, H. (2018). Structural control on hydrocarbon habitat in the Bawean area, East Java Sea. Proc. Indon Petrol. Assoc., 23rd Ann. Conv. https://doi.org/10.29118/ipa.1158.129.144

Pak, H., & Paal, S. G. (2025). A real-time structural seismic response prediction framework based on transfer learning and unsupervised learning. Engineering Structures, 323, 119227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119227

Prasetyo, W. E., Irawan, L. Y., Hartono, R., & Santosa, E. B. (2024). Seismic hazard analysis using Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis (DSHA) Method: A case study in Southern Malang District, East Java. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi: Kajian, Teori, Dan Praktek Dalam Bidang Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Geografi, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.17977/um017v28i22023p209-227

Pusat Studi Gempa Nasional. (2022). Peta Deagregasi Bahaya Gempa Indonesia untuk Perencanaan dan Evaluasi Infrastruktur Tahan Gempa.

Rifaldi, D. A., & Ahdika, A. (2024). K-Medoids and Support Vector Machine in Predicting the Level og Building Damage in Earthquake Insurance Modeling. Statistika: Statistics and Economy Journal, 104(3), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.54694/stat.2024.13

Senkaya, M., Erkan, E. F., Silahtar, A., & Karaaslan, H. (2024). Implementation of clustering algorithms for damage prediction through seismic local-site parameters: 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake sequence. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 22(13), 6545–6566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-02003-x

Susilo, A., Zulaikah, S., Fauzi, A., Ilham, Ma’muri, Wirawan, K., Haniyyah, S., Zarkoni, A., Persada, Y. D., Bery, A. A., & Rouf Hasan, M. F. (2026). Seismic site characterization of Malang Regency (Indonesia) using HVSR inversion. Kuwait Journal of Science, 53(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjs.2025.100486

Takagi, J., & Wada, A. (2019). Recent earthquakes and the need for a new philosophy for earthquake-resistant design. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 119, 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.11.024

Whittaker, A., Hart, G., & Rojahn, C. (1999). Seismic Response Modification Factors. Journal of Structural Engineering, 125(4), 438–444. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1999)125:4(438)

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.